STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS TOWARD THE EFFECTIVENESS OF COLLABORATIVE BRAINSTORMING IN ACADEMIC WRITING CLASSES
The 21st century skills include collaboration and teamwork, creativity and imagination, critical thinking, and problem solving. In writing classes collaborative brainstorming is one of many activities that can be conducted by teachers to help students develop their 21st century skills. It is because collaborative brainstorming makes students think critically and creatively, work better in groups, and solve problems collaboratively. This study investigated students’ perceptions on the use of collaborative brainstorming in an academic writing class and its effectiveness in the students’ eyes in writing. The participants of this study were thirty-three English Language Education Program (ELEP) students who were taking Academic Writing class. The data were analyzed qualitatively, supported by open ended questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. The results of the data analysis exposed to prove that collaborative brainstorming helps students in academic writing projects. Finally, this study indicates the importance of classroom interaction during classroom learning activities. This study also suggests a strategy to overcome students’ minor participation during group discussions.
Brown, V R & Paulus, P B. (2002). Making Group Brainstorming More Effective: Recommendations from an Associative Memory Perspective. Small Group Research, 29(4), 495-526.
De Dreu, C. K. W., Nijstad, B. A., & van Knippenberg, D. (2008). Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making. Personality and Social Psychology review, 12(1), 22-49.
Folch-Lyon, E. and Trost, J.F. (1981). Conducting Focus Group Sessions. Family Planning, Vol. 12, No. 12, pp. 443-449.
Goldenberg, O & Wiley, J (2010). Quality, Conformity, and Conflict: Questioning the Assumptions of Osborn’s Brainstorming Technique. The Journal of Problem Solving, 3(2), 96-118.
Issaksen, S. G. (1998). A Review of Brainstorming Research: Six Critical Issues for Inquiry (Monograph No. 302). Orchard Park, NY: Creative Problem Solving Group-Buffalo
Jossey-Bass & Pfeiffer (1998). The Pfeiffer Library Volume 26, 2nd Edition (1), 1-7
Kohn, N W & Smith, S M (2010). Collaborative Fixation : Effects on Others’ Ideas on Brainstorming. Applied Cognitive Psychology (24), 1-22.
Levine, J. M., Alexander, K. M., Wright, A. G. C., & Higgins, E. T. (2016). Group brainstorming: When regulatory nonfit enhances performance. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19, 257-271.
Mollin, C (2015). Capitalization of Remote Collaborative Brainstorming Activities. Computer Standards & Interfaces (Elsevier), 2016, Special Issue on Information System in Distributed Environment, 48 (C), pp.217-224.
Mongeau, P A. & Morr, M (1999). Reconsidering Brainstorming. Group Facilitation : A Research and Application Journal, 1999, 1(1), 14-21.
Newton, J (2018). Being an Effective Language Teacher in Constrained Circumstances: What does 21st Century Pedagogy Have to Offer? International Conference.
Ning-Fang (2013). Increasing High School Students’ Interest in STEM Education through Collaborative Brainstorming with Yo-yos.Journal of STEM Education : Innovations and Research, 14, 8-14.
Reinig, B A & Briggs, R O. (2008). On The Relationship between Idea-Quantity and Idea-Quality during Ideation. Group Decision and Negotiation, 17(5), 2008, pp. 403-420.
Schiavo, G., Cappelletti, A., Mencarini, E., Stock, O., & Zancanaro, M. (2016). Influencing Participation in Group Brainstorming Through Ambient Intelligence. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 32(3), 258-276..
Wong, L P (2008). Focus Group Discussion : A Tool for Health and Medical Research. Singapore Med J 49(3); 256
Yilmaz-Soylu, M & Akkoyunlu, B (2009). The Effect of Learning Styles on Achievement in Different Learning Environments. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology , 8(4), 43-50